Question details

asked in:
22471
Theminxy1
Theminxy1 (Rank: Juniorprofessor)

Do you think it a shame that the news is reporting greenpeace's latest publicity stunt more because it has breeched airport security, rather than as a means of drawing attention to their feelings about a third runway?

Whilst both issues are important, it doesn't seem right that the primary issue for the news is security.

supporters so far (last 10):

[Close window]
0

helpful

credits: 50
Asked in news, greenpeace asked on: 02/25/2008 06:53pm
closed on: 03/03/2008 06:53pm

3 Answers

21614
hdtg

hdtg

Rank: Nobel Prize Winner (7,604) | news (7)

31 minutes after the question was opened (02/25/2008 07:23pm)

1

I understand the sentiment, I am very much in support of many of greenpeaces efforts but an airport security breach is the more serious issue at a point in time where there are known terrorist threats and our indivdual freedoms are being erroded daily in the name of security.

If Greenpeace can breach security then who else might?


Supplement from 02/25/2008 07:24pm:

It was perhaps not the wisest way to focus peoples minds on the issues the are attempting to address

Question owner's rating:

helpful

Rated as good answer by:

supporters so far (last 10):

[Close window]
1

Rate as good answer

Number of comments:

0

Add your opinion

12845
KentPDG

KentPDG

Rank: Nobel Prize Winner (6,997) | news (12), greenpeace (5)

101 minutes after the question was opened (02/25/2008 08:33pm)

2

Greenpeace has some worthy goals, and some very important messages. However, it seems that their main intent is to stop all progress and change, and to half anything that has an effect on the completely natural environment. Overall, their apparent intent is not to move society forward, but to go backward, to a steadily smaller nation, of people who do less and less in the world around them, until eventually they achieve a wilderness with no one present except other Greenpeacers.

The methods they use -- not only in this instance, but almost always --are to disrupt and destroy, to halt progress by various forms of terrorism, to force others to stop rather than convince them to act in an ecologically responsible way. It appears that the airport incident may amount to criminal trespass, or felonious breach of airport security.

Because their tactics are so improper and even harmful, most of us lose sympathy with the motives and objectives of Greenpeace. The result is that, generally speaking, their actions are ineffectiev in accomplishing their ends, and they at best set themselves up as martyrs for their beliefs by going to jail.

Question owner's rating:

Top

Rated as good answer by:

supporters so far (last 10):

[Close window]
1

Rate as good answer

Number of comments:

2

2 Different opinions

29980
funrunna

funrunna

Rank: PhD (2,598) | news (16)

3 hours after the question was opened (02/25/2008 09:28pm)

3

I clearly see the green... But where's the peace?

Question owner's rating:

helpful

Rated as good answer by:

supporters so far (last 10):

[Close window]
0

Rate as good answer

Number of comments:

0

Add your opinion

This question has already been closed. You can write a different opinion to an answer or a comment to this thread.

  • Comments