reload | previous question | next question
supporters so far (last 10):
helpful
CGA
Rank: Nobel Prize Winner (6,136) | news (24)
12 minutes after the question was opened (04/09/2008 09:57am)
Everyone has already formed strong opinions on this and logic/reason does not apply any more. We will never really know.
Show answers rated "not helpful". (8)
This question has already been closed. You can write a different opinion to an answer or a comment to this thread.
reload
I agree with some of the views expressed however, for this case to have even gone to the the royal high court of justice there must have been a huge amount substantial evidence that could cause al fayed opinion. Not even money could have got this case to court.
Nah - all it takes is a significant amount of cash and a relatively good PR machine. Al Fayed dropped the "conspiracy" aspect in the last week of the inquest (out of earshot of the jurors, it should be noted) after it was pointed out to him that he had absolutely no evidence beyond his own opinion http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7326311.stm copy
the dodo died, dodi died, dido must be s**ting herself
It is considered to be bad form to rate people unhelpful on opinion questions, none of the answers here were offensive.
Ha ha ha ha ... what brilliant rating! The only one you rated as helpful was someone who said "We will never really know." Pure genius, ha ha ha ha. Bet the other members are well pleased with wasting time answering your questions, ha ha ha
Funny
